THE SYMBOLIC THOUGHT OF ASKA AND MAURA IN AURALASKA: A GEORGE HERBERT MEAD’S PERSPECTIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32682/jeell.v1201/42Keywords:
symbolic interaction, mind, characterAbstract
This study aims to examine the thoughts of the main characters through the perspective of George Herbert Mead's symbolic interactionism, specifically impulse, perception, manipulation, and consummation. This research employs a qualitative method. The data sources are sentences or dialogues of the main characters in the novel. The findings indicate that the characters' thoughts in the novel demonstrate symbolic thinking abilities in their interactions, particularly in the main characters, Maura and Aska. The symbolic thought interaction highlights the strength of consideration by taking into account the cause-and-effect relationships related to each character's actions. In the symbolic concept of mind, the results show that Maura is the most prominent character as the subject in the novel, while Aska functions as the object.
References
Ahmadi, Dedi (2008). Interaksi Simbolik: Suatu Pengantar. Jurnal Komunikasi Vol. 9 No. 2 Hlm. 301-315. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334424676_Interaksi_Simbolik_Suatu_Pengantar
Arbangi & Umiarso. (2021). Interaksionisme Simbolik Transendental Menuju Ke Basis Teori Integralistik. Malang: CV Literasi Nusantara Abadi. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1542937
Aminuddin. (2011). Pengantar Apresiasi Karya Sastra. Sinar Baru Algensindo. Bandung.
A. Sahir Syafrida. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: KBM Indonesia.
https://id.z-lib.gs/book/27026485/e95894/metodologi-penelitian.html?dsource=recommend
Endraswara, Suwardi. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Center for Academic Publishing Service. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GCS_EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=info:BgV7fEVQduIJ:scholar.google.com&ots=kA6n6dmSKN&sig=R6eg0jrtBJhcYYuakbZU2zV2WHE&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Fimeta, L. D. 2021. Auralaska. Depok: Coconut Books.
Mulyadi, Y. Y., & Liauw, F. (2020). "Wadah Interaksi Sosial". Jurnal Sains Teknologi Urban Perancangan Arsitektur (Vol. 2, No. 1) hlm: 37-44.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342660389_WADAH_INTERAKSI_SOSIAL
Muslim, Asrul. (2013). Interaksi Simbolik Dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat Multietnis. Journal Diskursus Islam. (Vol. 1, No.3) hlm. 484-494.
https://doi.org/10.24252/jdi.v1i3.6642
Ritzer, George & Goodman Douglas. (2010). Teori Sosiologi Modern. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
https://id.z-lib.gs/book/14958729/ba7353/teori-sosiologi-modern.html
Siregar, N. S. S. (2016). “Kajian Tentang Interaksionisme Simbolik”. Jurnal Perspektif, 1(2), 100–110.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339566475_KAJIAN_TENTANG_INTERAKSIONISME_SIMBOLIKSukardi. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Tripambudi, S. (2012). Interaksi Simbolik Antaretnik di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Vol. 10(No. 3), 321–341.
https://doi.org/10.31315/jik.v10i3.47
Wahyudi, Tri (2013). Sosiologi Sastra Alan Swingewood Sebuah Teori. Jurnal Poetika (Vol. 1 No. 1) hlm. 55-61. https://doi.org/10.22146/poetika.v1i1.10384
