TEENS, TEXT, AND TECHNOLOGY: THE PERCEPTION OF HIGH SCHOOL EFL WRITERS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Authors

  • Luthfia Yuha Rofiidah Universitas PGRI Jombang Author
  • Tatik Irawati Universitas PGRI Jombang Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32682/jeell.v12i3.102

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, EFL students, writing perception, technology use

Abstract

This study investigated senior high school EFL students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) in English writing activities. The study employed a qualitative descriptive design with purposive sampling involving eight EFL students in Jombang Regency who had prior experience using AI. Data were collected through open-ended questionnaires distributed via Google Forms and analyzed using thematic analysis. The results revealed two main themes: Academic Writing Support and Usability and Accessibility. Students perceived AI as beneficial for generating ideas, improving grammar, enhancing sentence clarity, organizing writing structures, increasing writing efficiency, and boosting their writing confidence. They also considered AI tools easy to learn, accessible across devices, and suitable for self-directed learning, although minor technical issues and concerns about dependence were noted. Beyond extending the constructs of perceived usefulness and ease of use from the Technology Acceptance Model, the results highlighted AI’s role as both a cognitive and emotional support system in writing. The study concluded that AI functioned not only as a technical aid but also as a reflective learning partner, shaping students’ autonomy and identity as writers. These insights suggested that AI could be integrated effectively into English language learning, provided that it is used ethically and supported by pedagogical guidance.

References

Almerich, G., Orellana, N., Suárez-Rodríguez, J., & Díaz-García, I. (2021). Predicting the use of digital technologies in education: A study based on the Technology Acceptance Model. Educational and Information Technologies, 26(1), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10213-1

Alzahrani, F. K. J., & Alotaibi, H. H. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on enhancing EFL writing skills among high school students. Journal of Educational and Human Sciences, (34), 226-240.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023, February 28). Statistik Indonesia 2023. BPS. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2023/02/28/18018f9896f09f03580a614b/statistik-indonesia-2023.html

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W., Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches (4th ed). SAGE Publications.

Gao, Y., & Wang, L. (2023). Understanding student agency in AI-assisted learning environments: A qualitative study of high school learners. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(3), 633–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231155092

Godwin-Jones, R. (2021). Artificial intelligence in language learning: The new revolution. Language Learning & Technology, 25(1), 1–13. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/44714

Godwin-Jones, R. (2023). Digital literacy and critical awareness in the age of AI. Language Learning & Technology, 27(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.10125/103947

Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Longman.

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

https://curriculumredesign.org/wp-content/uploads/AI-in-Education-Promises-and-Implications_CRR.pdf

Hyland, K. (2021). Second language writing (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Kim, J. (2023). Teens and AI: Exploring students’ attitudes toward the use of artificial intelligence in English writing. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00687-6

Kim, J., & Lim, S. (2024). Students’ perceptions of AI assistance in EFL writing: Benefit or dependency? Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 11(1), 22–39. http://www.jallr.com/

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., & Griffiths, M. (2022). The pedagogy of AI: Developing responsible, critical, and ethical learners. AI & Society, 37, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01212-x

Nguyen, H. H. B., Ngoc, H. H. B., & And, T. C. (2024). EFL students’ perceptions and practices of using ChatGPT for developing English argumentative essay writing skills. European Journal of Alternative Education Studies, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejae.v9i1.5341

Nursanti, Y. (2016). Students’ perception of teacher’s bilingual language use in an english classroom. Journal on English Education, 4(1). https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/L-E/article/view/4626

Perdana, I., Manullang, S., & Masri, F. (2021). Effectiveness of online Grammarly application in improving academic writing: review of experts experience. International journal of social sciences. 4. 122-130. https://doi.org.10.31295/ijss.v4n1.1444.

Rahimi, M., Jafari, S., & Amini, M. (2023). ChatGPT and the blank page: University students’ use of AI in academic writing. Journal of Academic Writing, 13(1), 1–17.

https://associationforacademicwriting.com

Rahimi, M., Zhang, L. J., & Shabani, M. B. (2023). Effects of ChatGPT on EFL students’ essay writing performance and perceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12808

Salama, M., Kamel, R., & Osman, H. (2024). Teachers’ acceptance of AI in academic writing: A TAM-based study in secondary education. Journal of Educational Technology Integration, 10(1), 22–35.

Saputra, R., & Hendriani, D. (2024). Exploring students’ perceptions of QuillBot for academic writing enhancement. TEFL Journal: Teaching English as a Foreign Language, 12(2), 115–128.

Shao, S. (2025). The role of AI tools on EFL students’ motivation, self-efficacy, and anxiety: Through the lens of control-value theory. Learning and Motivation, 91, 102154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102154

Sitorus, D., Arifin, M., & Sari, L. (2025). The impact of rule-based AI applications on EFL students’ grammar and pronunciation skills. Asian Journal of English Education, 17(1), 54–70.

Tampubolon, A., Fitriani, Y., & Hartono, R. (2025). EFL students’ responses to ChatGPT integration in English learning: A survey in secondary schools. Language and Education Technology Journal, 9(1), 30–45.

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

Wang, Y., & Lin, C. (2022). The role of perceived ease of use and usefulness in AI adoption for academic writing. Computers and Composition, 63, 102733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102733

Xie, H., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Wang, C. Y. (2023). Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: A review of 2009–2022 publications in selected SSCI journals. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 134–149.

https://www.j-ets.net

Yang, J., & Yu, Y. (2023). Exploring EFL learners’ acceptance of AI writing tools using an extended TAM framework. ReCALL, 35(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344022000197

Zhao, Y., Wang, M., & Li, J. (2021). Personalized learning with AI: Benefits, risks, and research gaps. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100038

Zheng, R., Lin, H., & Zhang, H. (2022). The impact of AI-powered writing assistants on students’ academic writing performance. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 25(3), 117–129.

https://www.j-ets.net

Zheng, Y., Li, J., & Tang, M. (2022). Evaluating the impact of AI writing tools on academic writing outcomes. Computers & Education, 184, 104528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104528

Downloads

Published

2025-10-28

How to Cite

TEENS, TEXT, AND TECHNOLOGY: THE PERCEPTION OF HIGH SCHOOL EFL WRITERS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. (2025). JEELL (Journal of English Education, Linguistics and Literature) , 12(3), 341-355. https://doi.org/10.32682/jeell.v12i3.102